Further Resources
Why Most Leadership Training is Complete Rubbish (And What Actually Works)
Related Articles:
Here's a question that'll make your head spin: why do we keep throwing good money after bad at leadership programs that wouldn't inspire a houseplant to grow?
After fifteen years of watching companies waste millions on glossy leadership retreats and motivational speakers who sound like they've been mainlining Tony Robbins audiobooks, I've reached a conclusion that might ruffle some feathers. Most leadership training is about as useful as a chocolate teapot, and we're all pretending otherwise because nobody wants to admit they've been buying snake oil.
The problem isn't that leadership can't be taught – it absolutely can. The problem is we're teaching it all wrong.
The Myth of the Natural Born Leader
Let's start with the biggest load of codswallop in the leadership space: the idea that great leaders are born, not made. This is complete nonsense, and it's actually harmful nonsense because it lets mediocre managers off the hook. "Oh well, I'm just not a natural leader," they shrug, whilst their team slowly dies inside during another pointless Monday morning meeting.
I've worked with trucking company owners in Western Sydney who could motivate a room better than most Fortune 500 CEOs. Did they go to Harvard Business School? Not bloody likely. But they understood something fundamental that gets lost in most leadership courses: people want to feel valued, not managed.
The truth is, leadership is a skill like any other. You can learn it, practice it, and get better at it. But here's where it gets interesting – the skills that actually matter aren't the ones most programs focus on.
What They're Teaching (And Why It's Wrong)
Walk into any corporate leadership seminar and you'll hear the same tired concepts: visionary thinking, strategic planning, change management frameworks. It's all very impressive-sounding, but it misses the point entirely.
Real leadership – the kind that actually gets results – happens in the messy, uncomfortable moments that no PowerPoint presentation can prepare you for. When your star performer hands in their resignation on the same day your biggest client threatens to walk. When you have to tell someone they're not getting the promotion they've been banking on. When the office gossip mill is working overtime and morale is in the toilet.
These situations don't require a SWOT analysis. They require emotional intelligence, genuine empathy, and the ability to have difficult conversations without making everything worse.
Yet most leadership programs spend about five minutes on communication skills and three hours on strategic frameworks that'll be outdated by the time you get back to the office.
The Australian Problem
Here's something that really gets my goat: most leadership training is designed by Americans, for Americans. Nothing wrong with our mates across the Pacific, but Australian workplace culture is different. We value straight-talking, we're naturally suspicious of corporate BS, and we respond better to authenticity than authority.
I once sat through a leadership course where the facilitator kept banging on about "cascading vision statements" and "synergistic team dynamics." Half the room was rolling their eyes so hard they nearly fell out of their chairs. In Melbourne, that approach goes down like a lead balloon.
Aussie workers respect leaders who roll up their sleeves, admit when they're wrong, and treat everyone with basic human decency. It's not rocket science, but you wouldn't know it from most training programs.
What Actually Works (The Uncomfortable Truth)
After watching hundreds of managers and team leaders over the years, I've noticed the ones who succeed share certain characteristics. And here's the kicker – none of them learned these things in a boardroom with a flip chart.
They listen more than they talk. Proper listening, not the kind where you're planning your response whilst pretending to pay attention. The best leaders I know ask questions and then actually wait for the answers. Revolutionary stuff, I know.
They give credit where it's due. This should be obvious, but you'd be amazed how many managers take all the credit when things go well and throw their team under the bus when they don't. Great leaders do the opposite – they deflect praise downward and shield their people from criticism from above.
They're comfortable with being uncomfortable. Leadership isn't about having all the answers; it's about being willing to ask the hard questions and sit with the uncertainty whilst you figure things out together.
I learned this lesson the hard way about eight years ago when I was consulting for a mid-sized logistics company in Brisbane. Their operations manager was struggling with a team that seemed perpetually disengaged. Instead of the usual team-building exercises (trust falls, anyone?), we focused on one simple thing: having real conversations about what wasn't working.
Turns out, the team felt micromanaged and undervalued. Simple problem, simple solution – but it required the manager to admit he'd been doing it wrong and change his approach. No framework required, just honest communication and a willingness to be vulnerable.
The Training That Actually Changes Things
So what should leadership development look like? Here's my controversial take: less classroom time, more real-world practice.
The most effective leadership program I've ever seen was run by a manufacturing company in Adelaide. Instead of sending managers to expensive retreats, they paired experienced leaders with newer ones and gave them actual challenges to work through together. No roleplay scenarios – real problems that needed solving.
They called it "leadership shadowing," and it worked because it was based on reality, not theory. The newer managers got to see how experienced leaders handled difficult situations, made tough decisions, and communicated with different personality types.
The results spoke for themselves: staff turnover dropped by 40% over eighteen months, and employee satisfaction scores went through the roof. More importantly, the managers who went through the program actually became better leaders, not just people who could recite leadership buzzwords.
The Role of Emotional Intelligence (Yes, It Matters)
Here's another area where traditional training falls short: emotional intelligence. Most programs treat it like an afterthought, a nice-to-have soft skill that gets a brief mention between discussions of KPIs and performance metrics.
This is backwards thinking. Emotional intelligence – the ability to understand and manage your own emotions whilst reading and responding appropriately to others – is the foundation of everything else.
I've seen technically brilliant managers fail spectacularly because they couldn't handle the human side of leadership. They could read a P&L statement like a bestselling novel but couldn't tell when their team was stressed, frustrated, or ready to quit.
Companies like Google and Microsoft have figured this out – they spend significant resources developing emotional intelligence in their leaders because they know it directly impacts productivity, retention, and innovation. Yet most Australian businesses are still treating it like fluffy feel-good nonsense.
The irony is that emotional intelligence is more measurable than most of the strategic planning rubbish we obsess over. You can see it in team performance metrics, staff turnover rates, and employee engagement surveys. But we'd rather focus on abstract concepts that sound impressive in board presentations.
Getting It Right: A Practical Approach
If you're serious about developing leaders (and I mean actually serious, not just ticking a compliance box), here's what I recommend:
Start with self-awareness. Before anyone can lead others effectively, they need to understand their own strengths, weaknesses, and blind spots. This isn't touchy-feely nonsense – it's practical intelligence that prevents costly mistakes.
Focus on communication skills that matter. Not presentation skills or public speaking (though they're useful), but the ability to have difficult conversations, give constructive feedback, and really listen to what people are telling you.
Make it ongoing, not a one-off event. Leadership development should be like fitness training – consistent, progressive, and adapted to real-world challenges. A two-day workshop isn't going to transform anyone's leadership abilities any more than a weekend at the gym will get you ready for a marathon.
The Bottom Line
Here's the uncomfortable truth that nobody in the training industry wants to admit: most leadership development is designed to make trainers rich, not make leaders better.
We've created an entire ecosystem of consultants, facilitators, and program designers who have a vested interest in making leadership seem more complicated than it actually is. Because if we admitted that good leadership is mostly about treating people well, listening actively, and making decisions based on evidence rather than ego, there wouldn't be much money in selling solutions.
The best leaders I know – and I've worked with some exceptional ones across mining, retail, professional services, and manufacturing – didn't learn their skills from a course. They learned by doing, failing, reflecting, and trying again. They learned by working with mentors who cared more about their development than their own reputation.
That's not to say formal training has no place. But it needs to be grounded in reality, focused on practical skills, and designed to support ongoing development rather than provide quick fixes.
Until we stop pretending that leadership is rocket science and start treating it as the very human skill it actually is, we'll keep wasting money on programs that don't work whilst wondering why our managers aren't getting any better.
The solution isn't more training – it's better training. Training that acknowledges the messy reality of leading people rather than the sanitised version we see in corporate presentations.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go explain to another client why their expensive leadership retreat didn't magically transform their managers into inspirational figures. Some conversations never get easier, but at least they're honest.